Sectors · 21 Sep 2026
US sectors this week: the read from Faircurve's model
Eleven sectors, 1,460 stocks the model covers. What the market did to the close of 21 Sep 2026, and what the model reads on its 19 Sep 2026 valuations.
Faircurve Insights · 21 Sep 2026
The S&P 500 fund is up 1.4% over 21 sessions, while the median stock is down in 10 of 11 sectors. Technology gained the most breadth over the week, with 52% of its names above their 50-session average, a rise of 5 points. Energy lost the most breadth, falling 38 points to 33%. Consumer Cyclical shows the weakest median stock performance, down 9.2% over 21 sessions.
Energy carries Faircurve's widest median gap at +5.5% across 65 graded names, with 66.2% of them below fair value. The model revised Energy's fair values this week, which fell 3.7% on prices down 4.3%. Basic Materials has the narrowest median gap at -1.3% across 56 graded names, with 44.6% below fair value.
Technology carries the most movement per name, with the options market's implied one-month move for its typical name at 14.5% and a median beta of 1.35. Realized volatility over 63 sessions is above its own year in Communication Services, at 20.6% against 15.8%. Healthcare's correlation to the S&P 500 moved to -0.14 over 63 sessions, against 0.23 over the year.
Written from the figures on this page for the close of 21 Sep 2026 and checked by rule before publishing: every number is one printed below, no forecast, no instruction. Not a recommendation.
The sentences behind the note, generated by rule
- Leadership: the S&P 500 fund is +1.4% over 21 sessions while the median stock of the 1,460 the model covers is down in 10 of 11 sectors. 7% of Utilities and 7% of Real Estate names sit above their 50-session average; 52% of Technology.
- Energy carries the model's widest gap: 66.2% of its 65 graded names trade below the model's fair value, median gap +5.5%. The fund is -2.0% over 21 sessions and its 63-session correlation to the S&P 500 is -0.36.
- Basic Materials carries the narrowest: median gap -1.3% across 56 graded names, 44.6% below fair value.
- Consumer Cyclical is the weakest inside: median stock -9.2% over 21 sessions, 9% of names above their 50-session average, and 9 of them report in the next 14 days.
- Technology carries the most movement per name: the options market's implied one-month move for its typical name is 14.5%, median beta 1.35, the highest of any sector.
- Moving apart from the S&P 500 over 63 sessions: Energy (-0.36), Healthcare (-0.14), Consumer Defensive (-0.22), Utilities (-0.10), Real Estate (-0.08).
- The model revised its fair values this week in Energy (median fair value -3.7% on prices -4.3%).
- Breadth on the week: Technology gained the most breadth: 52% of its names above their 50-session average, +5 points on the week; Energy lost the most: 33%, -38 points.
- Against the S&P 500 over 63 sessions: Energy led by +11.6 points and Utilities lagged by 13.0 points.
- Correlations that moved: Healthcare -0.14 to the S&P 500 over 63 sessions against 0.23 over the year; Real Estate -0.08 to the S&P 500 over 63 sessions against 0.25 over the year.
- Realised volatility over 63 sessions is above its own year in Communication Services (20.6% against 15.8%).
- Names moved most apart inside Communication Services: 13.7 points between its 25th and 75th name over 21 sessions, against 2.9 in Utilities.
The numbered read is generated from the figures below by fixed rules. Facts carry their window and date; the model's reading is the model's opinion on value, stated as such.
The board
Where each sector sits this week, on the funds and inside the names the model covers.
Sector by sector
Ordered by the model's median gap to fair value, widest first; sectors with fewer than 20 graded names come last with no model figure. Each card opens the sector's ranked list of names.
Energy
65 of 72 gradedThe model's widest gap to fair value this week; the fund -2.0% over 21 sessions; the model revised its fair values for this sector this week.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -2.0%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- +15.5%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -6.2%
- Above 50-session average
- 33%
- Implied 1-month move
- 12.2%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- -0.36
- Reporting in 14 days
- 0
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 66.2%
- Median gap
- +5.5%
- Change on week
- -0.4 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -4.3% / -3.7%
The model revised its fair values for this sector this week.
Widest gaps: PBF +58.3%, TALO +49.5%, EXE +44.6% · all 72 ranked
Healthcare
112 of 159 gradedThe model's median gap is +2.8%; the fund -2.0% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -2.0%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- +12.6%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -1.7%
- Above 50-session average
- 50%
- Implied 1-month move
- 11.0%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- -0.14
- Reporting in 14 days
- 0
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 60.7%
- Median gap
- +2.8%
- Change on week
- +0.6 pts
- Prices / fair values
- +0.4% / +0.4%
Widest gaps: UHS +48.3%, NEO +46.0%, BIO +45.5% · all 159 ranked
Financial Services
48 of 233 gradedThe model's median gap is +2.7%; the fund -1.8% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -1.8%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- +4.1%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -2.9%
- Above 50-session average
- 22%
- Implied 1-month move
- 9.3%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.42
- Reporting in 14 days
- 2
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 58.3%
- Median gap
- +2.7%
- Change on week
- -0.1 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -1.5% / -1.2%
Widest gaps: VCTR +44.0%, APAM +39.3%, AMP +38.9% · all 233 ranked
Consumer Defensive
68 of 81 gradedThe model's median gap is +2.4%; the fund -4.0% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -4.0%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -0.3%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -5.6%
- Above 50-session average
- 16%
- Implied 1-month move
- 10.2%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- -0.22
- Reporting in 14 days
- 7
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 60.3%
- Median gap
- +2.4%
- Change on week
- -0.2 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -0.9% / -0.7%
Widest gaps: ACI +50.2%, DLTR +40.9%, KR +25.6% · all 81 ranked
Technology
191 of 224 gradedThe model's median gap is +2.3%; the strongest inside, median stock +1.1% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- +6.4%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- +1.4%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- +1.1%
- Above 50-session average
- 52%
- Implied 1-month move
- 14.5%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.79
- Reporting in 14 days
- 6
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 55.0%
- Median gap
- +2.3%
- Change on week
- +0.8 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -1.3% / -1.2%
Widest gaps: VNT +55.5%, BDC +54.2%, QRVO +42.9% · all 224 ranked
Communication Services
30 of 41 gradedThe model's median gap is +2.0%; the fund +3.7% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- +3.7%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- +7.4%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -3.7%
- Above 50-session average
- 47%
- Implied 1-month move
- 11.7%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.37
- Reporting in 14 days
- 1
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 60.0%
- Median gap
- +2.0%
- Change on week
- +2.2 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -2.4% / -1.5%
Widest gaps: DIS +27.8%, SSTK +27.6%, NFLX +27.5% · all 41 ranked
Industrials
187 of 219 gradedThe model's median gap is +1.3%; the fund -5.4% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -5.4%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -6.5%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -5.4%
- Above 50-session average
- 15%
- Implied 1-month move
- 10.5%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.62
- Reporting in 14 days
- 5
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 55.6%
- Median gap
- +1.3%
- Change on week
- -0.7 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -1.5% / -1.5%
Widest gaps: KMT +57.6%, NPK +56.8%, OSK +53.0% · all 219 ranked
Consumer Cyclical
119 of 186 gradedThe model's median gap is +1.2%; the weakest inside, median stock -9.2% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -3.8%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -2.4%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -9.2%
- Above 50-session average
- 9%
- Implied 1-month move
- 11.7%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.63
- Reporting in 14 days
- 9
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 53.8%
- Median gap
- +1.2%
- Change on week
- -0.8 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -2.5% / -2.6%
Widest gaps: LEA +55.4%, BBWI +44.2%, PHIN +39.2% · all 186 ranked
Utilities
48 of 56 gradedThe model's median gap is +0.3%; the fund -7.1% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -7.1%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -9.1%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -5.5%
- Above 50-session average
- 7%
- Implied 1-month move
- 6.4%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- -0.10
- Reporting in 14 days
- 0
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 50.0%
- Median gap
- +0.3%
- Change on week
- 0.0 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -2.1% / -1.9%
Widest gaps: POR +31.0%, AVA +30.8%, PCG +28.4% · all 56 ranked
Basic Materials
56 of 79 gradedThe model's narrowest gap to fair value this week; the fund -5.2% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -5.2%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -3.7%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -6.4%
- Above 50-session average
- 18%
- Implied 1-month move
- 11.8%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- 0.29
- Reporting in 14 days
- 3
What the model reads
- Below fair value
- 44.6%
- Median gap
- -1.3%
- Change on week
- 0.0 pts
- Prices / fair values
- -2.6% / -2.1%
Widest gaps: AA +32.3%, RPM +23.5%, NEM +22.8% · all 79 ranked
Real Estate
7 of 110 gradedNo model figure: 7 of 110 names graded, fewer than 20; the fund -5.5% over 21 sessions.
What the market did
- Fund, 21 sessions
- -5.5%
- Fund, 63 sessions
- -3.2%
- Median stock, 21 sessions
- -6.1%
- Above 50-session average
- 7%
- Implied 1-month move
- 8.5%
- Corr. to S&P 500, 63s
- -0.08
- Reporting in 14 days
- 0
What the model reads
No figure: 7 of 110 names graded, fewer than 20.
Performance and risk, from the sector funds
Price returns from the SPDR sector funds, dividends excluded, in trading sessions to the close of 21 Sep 2026. Those funds are cap-weighted large caps on GICS sectors; the model's names are equal-weight and include mid and small caps on the model's own sector labels, so the two will disagree. Fund per sector: Technology XLK, Communication Services XLC, Financial Services XLF, Healthcare XLV, Energy XLE, Consumer Cyclical XLY, Consumer Defensive XLP, Basic Materials XLB, Industrials XLI, Real Estate XLRE, Utilities XLU.
| Sector | 1 week (5) | 1 month (21) | 3 months (63) | 6 months (126) | 1 year (252) | Year to date | Off 252-session high | Vol, 63 | Vol, 252 | Corr. S&P, 63 | Corr. S&P, 252 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnergyXLE | -3.2% | -2.0% | +15.5% | +5.3% | +39.2% | +39.7% | -5.3% | 21.9% | 22.0% | -0.36 | -0.19 |
| HealthcareXLV | +0.8% | -2.0% | +12.6% | +16.3% | +22.9% | +9.2% | -3.8% | 19.0% | 16.1% | -0.14 | 0.23 |
| Financial ServicesXLF | -2.0% | -1.8% | +4.1% | +13.9% | +3.3% | +2.1% | -4.5% | 12.7% | 14.5% | 0.42 | 0.54 |
| Consumer DefensiveXLP | -3.0% | -4.0% | -0.3% | +0.8% | +3.0% | +5.5% | -9.0% | 16.5% | 14.6% | -0.22 | -0.06 |
| TechnologyXLK | +5.7% | +6.4% | +1.4% | +44.0% | +41.1% | +35.3% | -1.7% | 29.5% | 26.5% | 0.79 | 0.85 |
| Communication ServicesXLC | -0.3% | +3.7% | +7.4% | +2.2% | -3.5% | -2.5% | -4.4% | 20.6% | 15.8% | 0.37 | 0.56 |
| IndustrialsXLI | 0.0% | -5.4% | -6.5% | +5.1% | +11.3% | +9.6% | -8.9% | 16.2% | 17.2% | 0.62 | 0.71 |
| Consumer CyclicalXLY | -0.5% | -3.8% | -2.4% | +4.2% | -6.7% | -6.0% | -9.9% | 19.9% | 19.5% | 0.63 | 0.77 |
| UtilitiesXLU | -2.8% | -7.1% | -9.1% | -8.9% | -3.7% | -4.8% | -14.8% | 14.7% | 15.2% | -0.10 | 0.12 |
| Basic MaterialsXLB | -1.5% | -5.2% | -3.7% | +5.8% | +9.4% | +9.6% | -7.4% | 17.4% | 17.8% | 0.29 | 0.53 |
| Real EstateXLRE | -1.2% | -5.5% | -3.2% | +4.9% | +1.3% | +5.6% | -7.4% | 13.6% | 13.9% | -0.08 | 0.25 |
| S&P 500SPY | +1.7% | +1.4% | +3.9% | +19.3% | +16.8% | +13.4% | -0.6% | 11.8% | 13.0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Inside the sectors, from the stocks the model covers
Equal-weight figures across the model's names: the median stock's 21-session price return, the spread between the 25th and 75th of those returns, the share of names above their 50-session average, and the engine's own risk figures as sector medians. Beta is how much a stock moves with the S&P 500, with rate moves held constant, measured over the last 252 sessions; idiosyncratic volatility is the stock's own annualised volatility after market and rate moves are removed, over the same 252 sessions; both on US-listed names, 20 or more. The implied one-month move is the options market's 30-day implied volatility for the typical name, scaled to a month.
| Sector | Median stock, 21 | Spread, 21 | Above 50-session avg | Median beta | Median idiosyncratic vol | Implied 1-month move | Reporting in 14 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy72 names | -6.2% | 6.1 pts | 33% | 0.12 | 37.2% | 12.2% | |
| Healthcare159 names | -1.7% | 8.4 pts | 50% | 0.52 | 37.1% | 11.0% | |
| Financial Services233 names | -2.9% | 5.2 pts | 22% | 0.62 | 25.3% | 9.3% | FDS, JEF |
| Consumer Defensive81 names | -5.6% | 9.8 pts | 16% | -0.03 | 30.4% | 10.2% | CAG, CALM, COST, GIS, LW, MKC, STZ |
| Technology224 names | +1.1% | 11.7 pts | 52% | 1.35 | 47.5% | 14.5% | ACN, CNXC, JBL, MU, PRGS, SNX |
| Communication Services43 names | -3.7% | 13.7 pts | 47% | 0.48 | 35.9% | 11.7% | SCHL |
| Industrials219 names | -5.4% | 6.8 pts | 15% | 0.94 | 32.7% | 10.5% | AIR, AYI, CTAS, PAYX, WOR |
| Consumer Cyclical186 names | -9.2% | 8.7 pts | 9% | 0.74 | 37.3% | 11.7% | AZO, CCL, DRI, KBH, KMX, MLKN, MTN, NKE, THO |
| Utilities56 names | -5.5% | 2.9 pts | 7% | -0.14 | 19.4% | 6.4% | |
| Basic Materials79 names | -6.4% | 8.9 pts | 18% | 0.84 | 34.0% | 11.8% | FUL, RPM, WS |
| Real Estate110 names | -6.1% | 5.3 pts | 7% | 0.24 | 22.7% | 8.5% |
What each sector moves with
63-session correlations of daily returns between each sector fund and the S&P 500, Treasuries (IEF), high-yield credit (HYG), gold, copper and the VIX.
| Sector | S&P 500 | Bonds | Credit | Gold | Copper | VIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnergyXLE | -0.36 | -0.43 | -0.32 | -0.14 | -0.06 | 0.28 |
| HealthcareXLV | -0.14 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.09 | -0.03 | 0.04 |
| Financial ServicesXLF | 0.42 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.36 |
| Consumer DefensiveXLP | -0.22 | 0.21 | 0.03 | -0.15 | -0.29 | 0.17 |
| TechnologyXLK | 0.79 | 0.23 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.56 |
| Communication ServicesXLC | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.17 | -0.10 | 0.03 | -0.14 |
| IndustrialsXLI | 0.62 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.24 | -0.47 |
| Consumer CyclicalXLY | 0.63 | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.23 | -0.58 |
| UtilitiesXLU | -0.10 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.01 | -0.12 | 0.01 |
| Basic MaterialsXLB | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.29 | -0.34 |
| Real EstateXLRE | -0.08 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
Sector to sector, 63 sessions
| XLK | XLC | XLF | XLV | XLE | XLY | XLP | XLB | XLI | XLRE | XLU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 1.00 | -0.13 | -0.04 | -0.47 | -0.26 | 0.18 | -0.61 | 0.05 | 0.57 | -0.38 | -0.17 |
| XLC | -0.13 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.20 | -0.31 | 0.67 | 0.39 | 0.18 | -0.06 | 0.31 | -0.14 |
| XLF | -0.04 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.31 | -0.20 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.06 |
| XLV | -0.47 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 1.00 | -0.03 | 0.17 | 0.62 | 0.34 | -0.12 | 0.50 | 0.19 |
| XLE | -0.26 | -0.31 | -0.20 | -0.03 | 1.00 | -0.38 | 0.01 | -0.17 | -0.30 | -0.06 | 0.12 |
| XLY | 0.18 | 0.67 | 0.48 | 0.17 | -0.38 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.17 | -0.14 |
| XLP | -0.61 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.32 | -0.23 | 0.63 | 0.32 |
| XLB | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.46 | 0.34 | -0.17 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.19 |
| XLI | 0.57 | -0.06 | 0.29 | -0.12 | -0.30 | 0.21 | -0.23 | 0.39 | 1.00 | -0.07 | 0.16 |
| XLRE | -0.38 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.06 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.31 | -0.07 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
| XLU | -0.17 | -0.14 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.12 | -0.14 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 1.00 |
What the model reads, sector by sector
On the 19 Sep 2026 valuations, counting only names that pass the sitewide reliability rule (a high or medium evidence grade, no data flag, a gap inside 60%): the share of graded names trading below the model's fair value and the model's median gap to fair value across them. No figure for a sector with fewer than 20 graded names. The change on the week is split into what prices did and what the model's fair values did, on the names graded in both weeks.
| Sector | Graded of valued | Below fair value | Median gap | Change on week, pts | Prices moved | Fair values moved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 65 of 72 | 66.2% | +5.5% | -0.4 | -4.3% | -3.7% |
| Healthcare | 112 of 159 | 60.7% | +2.8% | +0.6 | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| Financial Services | 48 of 233 | 58.3% | +2.7% | -0.1 | -1.5% | -1.2% |
| Consumer Defensive | 68 of 81 | 60.3% | +2.4% | -0.2 | -0.9% | -0.7% |
| Technology | 191 of 224 | 55.0% | +2.3% | +0.8 | -1.3% | -1.2% |
| Communication Services | 30 of 41 | 60.0% | +2.0% | +2.2 | -2.4% | -1.5% |
| Industrials | 187 of 219 | 55.6% | +1.3% | -0.7 | -1.5% | -1.5% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 119 of 186 | 53.8% | +1.2% | -0.8 | -2.5% | -2.6% |
| Utilities | 48 of 56 | 50.0% | +0.3% | 0.0 | -2.1% | -1.9% |
| Basic Materials | 56 of 79 | 44.6% | -1.3% | 0.0 | -2.6% | -2.1% |
| Real Estate | 7 of 110 |
The model's figures say what the model concluded about the sector's stocks, and nothing about the sector's returns.
Get the Global Pulse by email: Faircurve's note on each market day. No account needed.